JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 14, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Juan Carlos Henao Pérez

✓Claimant Jose Joaquin Castro·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia de recursos contra auto que resuelve la solicitud
Accion De Tutela De Trabajadores De La Fundacion San Juan De Dios En Liquidacion
  • Rechazar solicitud de reposición y en subsidio anulación de sentencia SU484/08 por improcedente
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de Reposición y en subsidio de Anulación en contra del Auto 217 de 2011, por medio del cual se decidió rechazar por extemporánea la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia SU484-08.

La Sala RECHAZA por improcedente las solicitudes presentadas por el recurrente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de reposición y en subsidio anulación formulada por José Joaquín Castro.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.